CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock1470MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
+3932%
6.774 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
VS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1042 MHz
Base Clock
-
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
18
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
2304
Shading Units
120
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV630
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro V420
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs AMD FirePro W7100
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI FirePro V8750
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy