NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock1777MHz

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (130W vs 275W)

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)

1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB +5%

9.098 TFLOPS

Radeon R9 FURY X

8.602 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB +20%

6254

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

20

Radeon R9 FURY X +50%

30

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

42

Radeon R9 FURY X +54%

65

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB +2%

82

Radeon R9 FURY X

80

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

VS

Radeon R9 FURY X

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Jun 2015

GeForce 30

Generation

Pirate Islands

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1552 MHz

Base Clock

-

1777 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

500 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

HBM

128bit

Memory Bus

4096bit

224.0GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

20

SM Count

-

Compute Units

64

2560

Shading Units

4096

80

TMUs

256

32

ROPs

64

80

Tensor Cores

-

20

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

2 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

56.86 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

67.20 GPixel/s

142.2 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

268.8 GTexel/s

9.098 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

8.602 TFLOPS

9.098 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

8.602 TFLOPS

142.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA106

GPU Name

Fiji

GA106-150-KA-A1

GPU Variant

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

Ampere

Architecture

GCN 3.0

Samsung

Foundry

TSMC

8 nm

Process Size

28 nm

12 billion

Transistors

8.9 billion

276 mm²

Die Size

596 mm²

Board Design

130W

TDP

275W

300 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.2

8.6

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs NVIDIA T400

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs ATI Radeon X1550

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 6570

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD