NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh vs AMD FirePro M8900
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock990MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh
+210%
4.055 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
622 MHz
Base Clock
-
990 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
960
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
31.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
63.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
4.055 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.055 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
63.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Blackcomb
-
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
