CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.26GB/s)
5856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 220W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3070
+21738%
20.31 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070
VS
GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Sep 2007
GeForce 30
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.26GB/s
Render Config
46
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
32
184
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
165.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
317.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
20.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
317.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
G84
GA104-300-A1
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Board Design
220W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs ATI Radeon HD 3730
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs AMD Radeon R9 280
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs AMD FirePro W4100
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy