NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1200MHz vs 1125MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q
+676%
16.7 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM
2.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
585 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
58
SM Count
-
7424
Shading Units
896
232
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
16
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
261.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
16.70 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
16.70 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
261.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA103S
GPU Name
Baffin
GN20-E8-A1
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3 billion
496 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
