NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs Intel Arc A750

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 's Advantages

More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (912.4GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

6656 additional rendering cores

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 5 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2400MHz vs 1665MHz)

Lower TDP (225W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +98%

34.1 TFLOPS

Arc A750

17.2 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +58%

19771

Arc A750

12444

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +130%

92

Arc A750

40

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +104%

153

Arc A750

75

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti +99%

199

Arc A750

100

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

VS

Arc A750

Graphics Card

May 2021

Release Date

Oct 2022

GeForce 30

Generation

Alchemist

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz

Base Clock

2050 MHz

1665 MHz

Boost Clock

2400 MHz

1188 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

12GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6X

Memory Type

GDDR6

384bit

Memory Bus

256bit

912.4GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

80

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

10240

Shading Units

3584

320

TMUs

224

112

ROPs

112

320

Tensor Cores

448

80

RT Cores

28

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

6 MB

L2 Cache

16 MB

Theoretical Performance

186.5 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

268.8 GPixel/s

532.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

537.6 GTexel/s

34.10 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

34.41 TFLOPS

34.10 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

17.20 TFLOPS

532.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

GA102

GPU Name

DG2-512

GA102-225-A1

GPU Variant

ACM-G10

Ampere

Architecture

Generation 12.7

Samsung

Foundry

TSMC

8 nm

Process Size

6 nm

28.3 billion

Transistors

21.7 billion

628 mm²

Die Size

406 mm²

Board Design

350W

TDP

225W

750 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

1x 12-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.6

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 4855

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD