Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs Intel Arc A770M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs Intel Arc A770M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Arc A770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (35W vs 120W)
Intel Arc A770M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1650MHz vs 1605MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q
8.218 TFLOPS
Arc A770M +64%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1605 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

77.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
211.2 GPixel/s
128.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
422.4 GTexel/s
8.218 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.03 TFLOPS
8.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
128.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
DG2-512
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.7 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
120W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy