Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +628%
13.52 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy