Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +2740%
13.52 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
215W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy