Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +135%
13.52 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2014
GeForce 40
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

18
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
2560
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Vesuvius
-
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy