Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +57%
13.52 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
96bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy