Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2640MHz vs 2040MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +331%
13.52 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
32bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
12
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy