Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

18
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy