NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (2535MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
+639%
22.06 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
34
SM Count
14
4352
Shading Units
896
136
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
TU117
AD104-150-K1-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
