CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
+5338%
29.15 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Mar 2024
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1920 MHz
Base Clock
-
2475 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
504.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
46
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
5888
Shading Units
216
184
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
36 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
158.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
455.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
29.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
29.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
455.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GT200
AD103-175-K1-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
200W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon R9 370
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs ATI Radeon HD 4450
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD FirePro S7000
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon RX 470
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy