CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2475MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
6928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (220W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
+5853%
35.48 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
VS
GeForce GTX 295
Graphics Card
Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1980 MHz
Base Clock
-
2475 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
504.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
56
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
7168
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
80
ROPs
28
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
198.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
554.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
35.48 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
35.48 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
554.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT200B
AD104-350-A1
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
220W
TDP
289W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs ATI Radeon X1600
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs AMD Radeon HD 7750
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs ATI FireGL V5600
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy