CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs ATI Radeon X1650
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs ATI Radeon X1650
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
ATI Radeon X1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
8448 additional rendering cores
Score
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
VS
Radeon X1650
Graphics Card
Jan 2024
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.3GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
66
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8448
Shading Units
-
264
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
264
Tensor Cores
-
66
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
250.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
44.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
689.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
RV516
AD103-275-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Board Design
285W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD FirePro D300
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro V340
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy