CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
9712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
+139157%
48.74 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
VS
GeForce 210 PCI
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
76
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
9728
Shading Units
16
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GT216
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Board Design
320W
TDP
31W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 3750
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy