CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
9512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
+8993%
48.74 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
76
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
9728
Shading Units
216
304
TMUs
72
112
ROPs
28
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GT200
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
65 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
320W
TDP
182W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
4
NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 X2 PCI
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB vs AMD FirePro W2100
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
2
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
3
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
4
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
5
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
6
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
7
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
8
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
9
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
10
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy