NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 9 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 135% (2550MHz vs 1085MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)

9600 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages

Lower TDP (60W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +3659%

52.22 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

1.389 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +2146%

28418

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

1265

Blender

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +9369%

9280

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

98

OctaneBench

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +2655%

992

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

36

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

VS

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Graphics Card

Jan 2024

Release Date

Feb 2014

GeForce 40

Generation

GeForce 700

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2295 MHz

Base Clock

1020 MHz

2550 MHz

Boost Clock

1085 MHz

1438 MHz

Memory Clock

1350 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6X

Memory Type

GDDR5

256bit

Memory Bus

128bit

736.3GB/s

Bandwidth

86.40GB/s

Render Config

80

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

10240

Shading Units

640

320

TMUs

40

112

ROPs

16

320

Tensor Cores

-

80

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SMM)

64 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

285.6 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

17.36 GPixel/s

816.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

43.40 GTexel/s

52.22 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

52.22 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1389 GFLOPS

816.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

43.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD103

GPU Name

GM107

AD103-400-A1

GPU Variant

GM107-400-A2

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Maxwell

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

28 nm

45.9 billion

Transistors

1.87 billion

379 mm²

Die Size

148 mm²

Board Design

320W

TDP

60W

700 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

5.0

6.7

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 290

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 570 X2

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD