CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
9664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+30362%
48.74 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080
VS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
76
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
9728
Shading Units
64
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
G92
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
320W
TDP
105W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
3
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
7
NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs ATI FirePro V8750
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy