NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1455MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q
+1051%
28.31 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
16
9728
Shading Units
1024
304
TMUs
64
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
163.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
442.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
28.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
28.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
442.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
TU117
GN21-X11
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
12 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
