CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090D and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1008GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
14544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 425W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090D
+50969%
73.54 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090D
VS
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Dec 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2280 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1008GB/s
Bandwidth
38.02GB/s
Render Config
114
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
14592
Shading Units
48
456
TMUs
24
176
ROPs
12
456
Tensor Cores
-
114
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
443.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
1149 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
73.54 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
73.54 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
1149 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
G94B
AD102-250-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Board Design
425W
TDP
75W
800 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs MTT S80
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs ATI Radeon HD 3750
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs AMD FirePro S9150
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs AMD Radeon R7 250E
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs AMD FirePro R5000
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy