Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM GeForce2 Ultra and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2000
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 2
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
230 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
7.360GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
-
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

NV15
GPU Name
GT200B
GeForce2 Ultra
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Celsius
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.025 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
88 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

7.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
1.5
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy