Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM GeForce2 Ultra and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 23 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2000
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 2
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
230 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
7.360GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
22
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

NV15
GPU Name
AD107
GeForce2 Ultra
GPU Variant
-
Celsius
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.025 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
88 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

7.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
1.5
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy