Intel GMA X3500 vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 and 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel GMA X3500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 65W)
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Dec 2023
GMA Graphics
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Dependent
Bandwidth
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
1
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
667.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
5.336 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
13W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Bearlake
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
Bearlake (G35)
GPU Variant
-
Generation 4.0
Architecture
Xe-LPG
Intel
Foundry
Intel
90 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
