Intel GMA X3500 vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 and 0System Shared VRAM Jetson Nano GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Jetson Nano GPU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock921MHz
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 13W)
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2019
GMA Graphics
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
640 MHz
-
Boost Clock
921 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
128
8
TMUs
16
1
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
667.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.74 GPixel/s
5.336 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.74 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
471.6 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
235.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Bearlake
GPU Name
GM20B
Bearlake (G35)
GPU Variant
TM660M-A2
Generation 4.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
20 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
5.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.4
