Home GPU Comparison Intel GMA X4500 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Intel GMA X4500 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 6200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel GMA X4500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GMA X4500
0.085 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 +894%
0.845 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2014
GMA Graphics
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
384
10
TMUs
48
1
ROPs
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

533.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
5.330 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
85.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
844.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

13W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Eaglelake
GPU Name
Broadwell GT3e
-
-
-
Generation 5.0
Architecture
Generation 8.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy