Home GPU Comparison Intel GMA X4500M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile

Intel GMA X4500M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA X4500M and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel GMA X4500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1450MHz
560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GMA X4500M
0.064 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile +2800%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
GMA Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1450 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
80
Shading Units
640
10
TMUs
40
1
ROPs
20
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

400.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.00 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.712 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Eaglelake
GPU Name
Raptor Lake GT1
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 5.0
Architecture
Generation 12.2
Intel
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

13W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy