Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +506%
13.89 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jun 2013
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
1536
432
TMUs
128
192
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
225W
800 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy