Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
Lower TDP (400W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A
13.89 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +6%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
6144bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
8192
432
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
128
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
500W
800 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy