Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +2906%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
24
6912
Shading Units
192
432
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
24
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
150W
800 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy