Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
6816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +5939%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Mar 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
768MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
12
6912
Shading Units
96
432
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
24
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

400W
TDP
134W
800 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
90 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.0
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy