Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1005MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +1289%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jan 2017
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
756 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
977 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
512
432
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.63 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.26 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
30W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy