Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
6464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +1251%
13.89 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jul 2011
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
14
6912
Shading Units
448
432
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
48
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
225W
800 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy