NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100B
+4160%
13.89 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Jun 2013
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
192
432
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
16
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
130W
800 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
