Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +17262%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jun 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
4
6912
Shading Units
32
432
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

400W
TDP
50W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy