Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
6840 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +8474%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jun 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
9
6912
Shading Units
72
432
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

400W
TDP
45W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy