NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
6896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100B
+53323%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
May 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
6144bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
2
6912
Shading Units
16
432
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
400W
TDP
17W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
