Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (226W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +3517%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Apr 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
16
6912
Shading Units
128
432
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
16
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

400W
TDP
226W
800 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy