Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1543MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +151%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Feb 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
1792
432
TMUs
112
192
ROPs
64
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
16 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

400W
TDP
75W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy