Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
6672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +2133%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
30
6912
Shading Units
240
432
TMUs
80
192
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
189W
800 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy