Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +1794%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Mar 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
384
432
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
51W
800 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy