Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K1 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K1 +307%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G84
GK107-450-A2
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy