NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
+8703%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
May 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1536
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
17W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G86
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.175
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0
