NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
+85%
4.252 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2015
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM204
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4
