NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
2.289 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216
+517%
14.13 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Nov 2019
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1536
Shading Units
5120
128
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GV100
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
