Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K2 +1702%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1536
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G94
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.175
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy