Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200 +203%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
576
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy