Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200 +111%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy